Category Archives: Angel investments

(SHARING) Cap Tables, Share Structures, Valuations, Oh My! A Case Study of Early-Stage Funding

Source and credit:   Crunchbase

=======================================================

For many entrepreneurs, especially first-time founders, raising outside capital can be daunting. Between all of the new vocabulary – like “term sheets,” “capitalization tables,” “pro rata,” and different valuation metrics – and the very real legal implications of the agreements being signed, it’s easy to get overwhelmed.

Follow Crunchbase News on Twitter & Facebook

When you’re first starting out (or just need a refresher), it’s often best to learn from examples. So, that’s what we’re going to do today. We’re going to explain the basic mechanics of the first rounds of funding, some of the key terms involved, and how different types of financial instruments and deal structures work. Let’s start a company and build a capitalization table! And, for the sake of keeping this accessible, we’re going to try to keep the terms simple.

(Also note: all companies and funds mentioned in this article are fictitious and presented for the sake of example. Any resemblance to real firms is purely coincidental.)

Founding A New Company

Let’s start at the beginning. Imagine two founders, Jack and Jill. Their idea: The Internet of Wings, a buffalo chicken restaurant featuring drone delivery to all of Silicon Valley and beyond.

They work with a lawyer to set up a corporation. The two decide to split their stakes at a 60-40 ratio, with the majority going to Jill because she’s going to serve as CEO and has the technical background to make the scalable part of the business – drone-based delivery – a reality. They also decide to set aside 20 percent of the shares in an equity pool for future employees. So, here’s how the ownership stakes break down at the start:

  • 48 percent to Jill
  • 32 percent to Jack
  • 20 percent for an employee pool

Internet of Wings Inc. (abbreviated IoW, like IoT but involving poultry) was established as a Delaware C corporation – the standard type of legal entity for venture-backed startups – with 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding, issued at a par value of $0.001 per share. With this, in the eyes of the law, the company is now valued at $10,000. Here is the capitalization table for the company at this point:

Jack sets to work developing a chicken sandwich that appears to be lovingly hand-crafted, even when produced at industrial scale. And he may or may not have taken “inspiration” from Apple’s patented pizza boxes when creating packaging to keep the sandwiches intact and warm, but not soggy, during the short airlift from IoW’s rented kitchen space to the customer. Meanwhile, Jill hacks together a drone capable of flying chicken sandwiches hither and yon.

After months of working nights and weekends, they go to a park – their Kitty Hawk – and successfully make their first flight, which was captured on video and subsequently went viral on Periscope. With demonstrated demand for the novel idea but no cash to cover the costs of the business, Jill determines it’s time to raise some outside capital in a Seed round.

Seed Round Dynamics

Seed rounds come in two main flavors: priced and unpriced. A priced Seed round is much like any other round of funding in that the company is given a valuation, and shares in the company are purchased for cash by investors at a price determined by that valuation.

But today, due to their popularity relative to their priced cousins, as well as their unique structures and financial instruments, we’re going to focus on unpriced seed rounds in this section.

As the name suggests, in an unpriced round, the company is not given a valuation, and the investor isn’t necessarily purchasing a known amount of equity at the time of investment. Rather, it’s an agreement between the investor and the company to issue shares in a future, priced round in exchange for an infusion of cash at the time the unpriced Seed deal is struck.

The two most common financial instruments used in unpriced seed rounds are convertible notes and so-called Simple Agreements for Future Equity (or “SAFE notes”). A convertible note is a financial instrument that is issued first as debt, but then converts to equity under predetermined conditions, such as raising a priced round. A SAFE note is like a convertible note, except it’s not a debt instrument, meaning that SAFE notes don’t carry an obligation to pay interest. Introduced in late 2013 by Y Combinator, the prominent Silicon Valley-based incubator program, SAFE notes are generally thought to be more founder-friendly than convertible notes precisely because they aren’t treated like debt, so they don’t have a maturity date or interest payments associated with them. And as an added point of convenience, the agreements tend to be short, and there are comparatively fewer terms for founders to negotiate.

Risk Management

Because Seed investors take on a lot of risk by investing in very early-stage companies, they’ll oftentimes add a number of provisions to their investment agreements to ensure they get a sufficiently large piece of the company to justify that risk. Two of the most common provisions in unpriced rounds are “discounts” and “valuation caps.”

True to its name, a discount provision grants investors the right to purchase shares at a discount from the price of shares in the next funding round. In this case, the next round is Series A, which is typically the first priced funding round a company experiences (and the point at which the convertible note or SAFE would convert to shares). Separately, a valuation cap puts a ceiling on the valuation of the company such that the investor can ensure they get a certain percentage share of a company. This helps to prevent a runaway valuation from squeezing the percentage share they’d be able to purchase in the company.

The Seed Deal

Back to Jack and Jill. They decide to raise capital in an unpriced Seed round for their startup. They figure they need to raise $5 million to get their company off the ground. After soliciting introductions from their network, and lots of back and forth, they find two investors eager to commit the entirety of the round.

Opaque Ventures agrees to a $2.5 million SAFE with a 20% discount provision, and BlackBox Capital will invest $2.5 million in a SAFE that has a $10 million valuation cap on the company’s pre-money valuation. Agreements are signed, money is wired to the company’s bank account, and Jack and Jill resume the process of building their venture.

It’s important to note that, at this time, no new shares have been created, and the value of the company remains the same because, again, this is an “unpriced” round where no new value is assigned.

Series A Dynamics

Fast forward 18 months. Business is booming, with a fleet of drones buzzing all around the Bay Area delivering chicken sandwiches to hungry customers. Jill and Jack have marshalled the financial resources from their Seed round well, having invested heavily in R&D, a few good engineering hires, and a few agreements with drone manufacturers overseas. But despite rapid growth, the company isn’t profitable and only has eight months left before it runs out of cash.

It’s time to raise a Series A round. If a company hasn’t already raised a priced round, Series A is typically when the shares of a startup receive their first valuation.

Amongst venture capitalists and other startup investors, it’s common to hear two types of valuations mentioned: “pre-money” and “post-money.” Put simply, a pre-money valuation is the value of the company prior to (hence “pre-”) the round’s infusion of capital. The post-money valuation is the value of the company after the round is complete, and it’s usually calculated by adding the amount of money raised in the round to the pre-money valuation.

The Deal

Jack and Jill went to Sand Hill to raise their Series A. They want to raise $7 million. They meet with many, many investors, and ultimately work out a deal with two new firms. One of their previous investors, BlackBox, opted to participate in the round. Here’s the breakdown:

  • Cormorant Ventures will lead the round by investing $4 million
  • Provident Capital is participating with its investment of $2 million
  • BlackBox Capital rounds out the round with $1 million

Analysts at Cormorant Ventures determine that Internet of Wings Inc. is worth $15 million prior to any investment. This is its “pre-money valuation.” Although it’s tempting to think that the company’s post-money valuation would be $22 million (by summing the pre-money valuation and the amount being raised here) we’ll see that the post-money valuation is actually a bit higher due to the discount and cap provisions used by the seed investors.

The final signing of checks and legal paperwork sets off a cascade of conversions and capitalization table adjustments as the company issues new shares to its investors.

Seed Conversions

Let’s start with our Seed investors whose investments will convert to equity at this stage.

Opaque Ventures invested $2.5 million in a SAFE with the ability to purchase shares at a 20% discount to the pre-money valuation at Series A. The Series A price is $1.50 per share ($15 million pre-money valuation divided by 10 million shares, the number of shares originally created when the firm was incorporated, which we noted earlier), so at a 20% discount ($1.20 per share), Opaque Ventures’ $2.5 million investment converts to 2,083,333 shares ($2.5 million divided by $1.20 per share) valued at $3.125 million, a 1.25x multiple on invested capital.

In the Seed round, BlackBox Capital invested $2.5 million in a SAFE with a valuation cap of $10 million. This allows them to purchase shares at $1.00 per share ($10 million cap / 10 million shares outstanding), resulting in the purchase of 2.5 million shares from their seed investment. At the new $1.50 share price, BlackBox Capital’s Seed investment is now valued at $3.75 million, a 1.5x multiple on invested capital.

Series A Investors

At a Series A stock price of $1.50, Cormorant Ventures purchased 2,666,666 shares with its $4 million investment. Provident Capital purchased 1,333,333 shares with its $2 million investment. And with its $1 million follow-on funding in the Series A round, BlackBox Capital purchases an additional 666,666 shares of Series A stock.

Ownership Breakdown

Here’s how the ownership of the company breaks down after the Series A round. Let’s start first with our capitalization table after the Series A funding round is complete.

The post-money valuation of the company after raising its Series A round is roughly $28.875 million. Recall our temptation to say the post-money valuation should be $22 million ($15 million pre-money valuation plus $7 million raised in the round), but that would be incorrect in this case.

Clauses like valuation caps and discounts allow investors to purchase shares at a price lower than the prevailing price per share. This increases the number of shares they are able to purchase, and thus results in more shares being created.

To further illustrate that, let’s think about what would have happened if IoW’s Seed investors didn’t implement caps or discounts. They would have been issued stock at the regular share price of $1.50 and, accordingly, wind up with a smaller percentage of the company. The terms they put into their investment agreements both raised the post-money valuation of the company by generating more shares, and they served to give these investors a larger chunk of the company than they’d otherwise be entitled to if they purchased shares at the $1.50/share price paid by Series A investors.

Here’s the percentage breakdown of the company’s different share classes between Seed and Series A rounds.

One of the other important things to note is that, on a percentage basis, Jack, Jill, and the employee equity pool’s relative share of the company has decreased on a percentage basis. This is known as dilution. Financially, dilution isn’t really a big deal, because even a shrinking slice of the proverbial pie is still valuable if the size of the pie – the value of the company – continues to grow. For example, although holders of Common Stock own just 52 percent of the company after its Series A round, their collective stake is now valued at $15 million. And so long as share prices continue to increase in subsequent rounds, the value of their stock will continue to increase as well even as they continue to be diluted.

(Down rounds flip the math here, both diluting current shareholders, and driving down the value of their stake. More on that in a coming piece.)

Where dilution does matter, though, is in the control and voting structure of the company. In most voting agreements, voting power is often tied to the number and type of shares held by a given shareholder, founders and other investors can find themselves outnumbered during key votes as their percentage ownership of the company is diluted. This is the principal reason why many investors include anti-dilution provisions, to maintain their control in a company.

What We Learned

Raising outside money is one of the more esoteric aspects of being an entrepreneur, but it doesn’t need to be confusing. Although we used relatively simple terms here, we discussed the differences between pre- and post-money valuations, saw how different types of deal terms affect valuation and percentage ownership, and explained how raising new rounds of funding can lead to dilution of founders’ and early investors’ stakes in a company over time.

Things are often considerably messier in the real world, but the underlying mechanics discussed here still hold.

Advertisements

Meta Secures $23M in Series A led by Horizons Ventures, Tim Draper and Y-Combinator partners

I’m glad to share with you that I’m an investor in Meta – an augmented reality hardware and software company. Glad to be in the same round with other industry veterans.

==============================

PORTOLA VALLEY, Calif.—January 28, 2015— Today Meta, the company to bring the first Augmented Reality computing wearable to market, announces the close of its $23 million Series A funding round. The round is led by Li Ka-Shing’s Horizons Ventures, Tim Draper, BOE Optoelectronics and Y-Combinator partners, Garry Tan and Alexis Ohanian. Other investors that participated in the round include Danhua Capital, Commodore Partners and Zappos Founder Tony Hsieh’ Vegas Tech Fund.

Meta glasses are the first holographic, see-through display that allow users to see, create and interact with digital objects shown in physical space. The company is envisioning a world that no longer isolates people with flat screens, but rather, brings them together and allows seamless interaction and collaboration between digital objects overlaid on the real world.

“We are humbled by the caliber of investors that have backed us and are helping us turn our dream into a reality. These are the very same people who first put their faith in Tesla and SpaceX and are now placing their confidence in our vision, and we couldn’t be more proud,” said Meron Gribetz, CEO of Meta.

Already, the company has shipped its first product, the Meta 1 Developer Kit after an incredibly successful Kickstarter campaign that ran in June 2013. Coupled with independent funding, they raised a total of $2 million by the end of the campaign. Now, over 1500 developers and companies such as the world’s largest architecture firm Arup, Salesforce and Stanford University based company, SimX are building augmented reality applications with Meta’s SDK.

To keep informed on Meta visit: http://www.getameta.com

About Meta:

Meta is an augmented reality hardware and software company based in Portola Valley; led by Founder & CEO, Meron Gribetz, Chief Scientist Prof. Steve Mann (inventor of wearable computing), Lead Advisor Prof. Steve Feiner (pioneer of augmented reality) and Director of User Interface Jayse Hansen (Hollywoods #1 user interface designer, creator of UIs for Iron Man 1, 3, Avengers, Hunger Games).

Meta glasses are the first holographic, see-through display that allow users to see, create and interact with digital objects displayed in physical space. Meta’s SDK has attracted over a thousand development groups who are building gaming applications and professional applications in the areas of medical simulation, data visualization, architectural visualization and industrial design.

What to look for when making angel investments?

Here, I’ll try to share some of the things I had to learn the hard way so that for whoever wishes to enter into angel investor, there’s some work cut out for them.

Note: this is something I am still learning along the way so please do correct me if I got it wrong

 

Investment philosophy
Everybody has their own philosophy (or simply put, whatever makes them tick). Here I’m sharing some of mine:

  1. Investor base – I only invest in companies along with other high profile investors (which would allow the company to have great access for future business development if or when required)
  2. Winning formula – I invest in companies with a winning angle (either by a special algorithm, patent protection, lack of competition etc). User traction is important but is not the only factor
  3. Profitability –  Having sheer user numbers is meaningless since a company could spend more money on performance marketing. A clear path to profitability is way more important (and how marketing turns into revenue)
  4. Valuation – I am ok with high valuation but it has to have some sort of support to it.
  5. Region – Most people invest in regions they are close to / understand well. I only invest in US startups but increasingly consider European and Asian ones (yet to do my first one)
  6. Management team – Some people insist of having the management team having successfully exited at least 1-2 startups. For me, I don’t have much of this restriction – as long as they aren’t straight off from college / business school.

The key here is to stick with the rules you set for yourself here. There would be occasions where you see investment opportunities which meets 4 or 5 out of 6 of the criteria, and you are really debating whether to break the rule just this once or not. (And don’t kid yourself, it happens more often than you think!). Rule of thumb is – never break / twist rules you set for yourself to meet one investment opportunity. Better ones will always present themselves further down the line.

Valuation 101
There are a couple of terminologies used which you would frequently see: Capital raisepre-money and post-money valuation.

  • Capital raise: the total amount a company is raising in a particular fundraising round
  • Pre-money valuation: the value (equity value) placed on a company before adding the capital being raised
  • Post-money valuation: Pre-money + capital raise

You would constantly see a company quoting a pre-money valuation in any given round as a basis, simply because pre-money valuation would stay the same while you continue to build up the amount you are raising, and to prevent re-calculation / re-drafting of termsheets if you quote a post-money valuation.

Type of security
There are two ways one could invest in a startup – Straight equity or convertible note. From many perspectives there are lots of differences, which I’ll try to layout a few.

1. Convertible note: Essentially a company is issuing a debt to investors, with the upside of converting to equity shares upon a few pre-determined conditions. Typical financial terms to look for include

  • Principal amount: The amount you are subscribing to in that particular convertible note
  • Interest rate: An accrued interest payment, calculated from the date of signature of the convertible note until the conversion of the note into equity secuirities
  • Equity cap: Different styles of convertible notes would call them slightly differently, but essentially this is the maximum pre-money valuation of your particular conversion, whereas the Series A priced round could be converting at the same time at a higher pre-money valuation. This matters particularly when you expect the Series A pre-money valuation is significantly ABOVE than the equity cap quoted here.
  • Discount rate: In case the Series A pre-money valuation is BELOW equity cap amount stated, then the pre-money valuation for the convertible note holder would be the pre-money stated by the Series A lead investor, less the discount rate stated here.

  • Expiry date: If the company does not raise an equity round on or before the expiry date, the convertible note is automatically converted (unless with written consent from both ends to forfeit the conversion and company agrees to pay investors back in debt holdings)

2. Equity round: Much less terms to look for (Pre-money valuation, capital raise) etc, but there are much more non-financial terms to look for within an SPA (share purchase agreement), e.g. voting rights, board seats, right-of-first-refusal (ROFR), right-of-first-offer (ROFO), and any other terms to protect minority shareholders investing into the company. The SPA can be a handful to read, spanning some 60-80 pages of legal languages. There would also be preference shares terms, as well as a money cap (e.g. 2x / 3x invested  capital)

A convertible note is very popular in US for multiple reasons

  1. Timing and legal issues: Drafting a convertible note purchase agreement is very fast, usually taking a few hours based on set templates. An SPA, however, could take days for the company attorney to draft, and another few days for investors to review and comment. If more than one investor(s) have edits on SPA, that could go on for much longer, and adding to due diligence period, an equity round takes months from termsheet to closing.
  2. Valuation: Placing a pre-money valuation at such early stage could be difficult. If too high then there isn’t enough risk-reward benefit for angel investors; too low then the founders risk selling too much at early stage. The convertible note is a “time buffer” which allows both parties to leave the valuation issue to the Series A lead investor, after proper due diligence and analysis.
  3. Equity cap gain: Usually when convertible note investors subscribe to the note, there is a good expectation of the company leading to a Series A equity round within a short period of time (6-12 months). There would also be an expectation that the equity cap amount is significantly low enough that, upon a Series A conversion, would allow the angel investors have a much lower pre-money valuation than the Series A investors. Effectively, their price per share is much lower
  4. Security: If an angel investor subscribes to an equity round pre-Series A, they get common shares. If a convertible note holder convert as Series A, all investors get Series A preference shares pari passu. There is downside protection to preference shareholders, and if upon a sale / IPO of the company that the asset is higher than the money cap, then all preference shareholders will elect to convert to common shares (i.e. upside is the same)

Usually a convertible note has a minimum commitment of $25k (although there are occasions where startups might accept smaller commitments). If you only have a few thousands to space, AngelList’s Invest Online function could be another option (although as I stated previously, I personally don’t prefer it)

Hopefully after the above, you’re equipped with the basics to understand how to do angel investments!

How I got into angel investing? – Part 2

How I got into angel investing? – Part 2
Opening the Pandora’s box

After I got into Superfly, as an exciting little angel, the first I did was to add that onto my LinkedIn profile. Listing myself as an “angel investor” was fun – a title I literally just bought for tens of thousand of dollars!

I also saw that there’s a website named AngelList, a site widely used by entrepreneurs and investors as a communication channel and almost a “marketplace” and “shopping cart”. I linked my profile to LinkedIn as well as filled in the rest of the details. So now I have two channels to communicate with startups – my existing LinkedIn profile as well as the newly created AngelList profile.

LinkedIn as a channel
Man oh man! I started receiving messages from entrepreneurs globally on LinkedIn (granted, mostly UK and US). On average, I received (and still do) roughly 10-15 investment opportunities per month via LinkedIn, and I turned down all of them (except one where I did do some due diligence but turned down in the end).

LinkedIn wasn’t really designed for that purpose. For an entrepreneur to reach out to an angel investor is not intuitive on LinkedIn, and it’s harder to send messages (you need to send an unprompted add request with a lead message / elevator pitch, followed by a full pitch and a deck. Not the most straightforward way to do so.

AngelList as a much better channel
AngelList on the other hand is a much easier one. They have a list of featured startups, and another list of trending ones depending on followers and who’s listed as investors / advisors. So immediately there’s some vetting of portfolio behind it. If there are startups I like, I can hit the “Get an intro” button (I might have used this a little too often admittedly) to get access to the management directly. It was great. Angel investors can also list the number of investments they make a year, and on average how much they invest per deal. Startups can then pick and choose who they wishes to reach out to. I receive, on average, another 20-25 requests a month (a little less these days considering I have done 6 deals thus far)

My Porftolio
Since I made Superfly investment, I moved on to make 5 others, 4 of each are direct investments with the startups and one was via SecondMarket.

  • Superfly – An online travel metasearch engine. Other investors include Bill Smith and Jeff Clarke
  • Centzy – A company which allows price comparison on local services, and aggregate offline data and make available which aren’t available anywhere else. The round that I participated in have other investors including Cowboy Ventures, Founder Collective, Lightbank, ff Venture Capital
  • CrowdMob – Mobile RTB, per per performance advertising platform.
  • Bang With Friends – Facebook and mobile app allowing “hook-up” with your friends anonymously. Other investors include Tim Draper
  • NetPlenish – Browser extension price comparison search engine. Investors include Dave McClure, Scout Ventures, Ludlow Ventures and an undisclosed strategic investor.

I did my investment of Visual.ly via SecondMarket, broker of the “Invest Online” function on AngelList. I hated that function. It gives you all the documents which you can read through online, and will give you access to a watermarked version of the company deck for review as well. It doesn’t give you access to the management and you make your due diligence research only on 3rd party resources. To me, angel investment is about getting direct access to the management and see if you share their vision, and whether you think there’s something you can contribute to the company. This was not what I got when investing through SecondMarket. All in all, it’s low quality money with no value-add to it. They also charge quite a hefty commission when raising the money from them. I’d strongly suggest against it to all future startups and investors.

Next time, I’ll walk through some of the philosophies I have when I examine investment opportunities, and what I’ve learnt from doing this.

… To be Continued

How I got into angel investing? – Part 1

How I got into angel investing? – Part 1
My first investment

I’ve been asked many times – what is a junior investment banker with next to no money doing in the startup investment space? I ask myself that very question all the time, while I stand humbly on level 1 looking upwards at the internet veterans who I am tagging along in the same rounds in my investments.

Bottom line is – angel investing is fun. There’s a lot you could learn from doing it.

I started my journey back in May 2012. There’s a company I’ve seen with some press coverage called Superfly. It’s a beautifully designed online travel metasearch engine, coupled with personal itinerary and loyalty membership information. It’s very similar to Mile Wise (and kudos to Yahoo! for taking them offline). CEO is Jonathan Meiri. First time I saw this on TechCrunch I thought it was a brilliant idea, and I see great future for them. For some reason, I thought it might be an even better idea if I knew the CEO so that if / when they raise money I want to be first to know about it and be able to put some money in. So, after some semi-stalking on LinkedIn I found his profile and sent him a message to introduce myself and to learn more about the company.

I later learned that Bill Smith as well as Jeff Clarke are both angel investors in this little company – quite an impressive investor base considering its Israeli-origin and early stage. After scrambling a lot through my savings account, I finally found some money to do it.

Coming from a completely different background, reading the termsheet wasn’t easy. Thanks to Thomas from MoFo, he taught me some of the basics here which would later become the foundation of my learning.

I finally signed and returned the termsheet to JM and shortly after wired over the money. I know I’ll have to sit on this for 3-5 years, with no liquidity and a very high chance of kissing it goodbye. But it felt right. It’s money I’m not using for a while, and could open a lot of doors in the online travel space for me.

I went about putting this on my LinkedIn profile and stated that I’m an angel investor in Superfly – a move which opened up quite a can of worms (in a positive way) for me.

…To be continued